Seems good on the outside but what about the exposure to that lifestyle I would consider it a form of child abuse !
And that abuse would take the form of what? I don't see a lot of people showing absolutely any interest in the welfare of foster children until someone brings up gay foster parents, then suddenly everyone is outraged. If there were enough quality heterosexual foster parents to go around I think a good case could be made that they should always take priority over singles or gays. But given the lack of regular couples I don't see what choice the states have.
"Seems good on the outside but what about the exposure to that lifestyle I would consider it a form of child abuse !"
So should children be taken away from the natural mother if she lives a lesbian life?
"Seems good on the outside but what about the exposure to that lifestyle I would consider it a form of child abuse! "
I agree with you completely; this type of thing is "scary" to me. I am not in favor of exposing kids to an openly gay lifestyle. But, let's be honest: How many children are not just "exposed" to certain lifestyles in "heterosexual" homes but are sexually molested? There are many pedophiles who fly under the radar, so to speak, and become Foster Parents only to molest children.