To: TXnMA; Alamo-Girl; betty boop
[ Creation can't hold up to rigors of science ]
Pity that modern science is in such state of PC..
Could be because of the huge Marxist bent of American academics..
Dielectic Agnosticism in a state of autistic obsession..
Basically; one thing they know for sure.. its NOT God..
Anything else, is possible..
918 posted on
02/14/2006 2:54:52 PM PST by
hosepipe
(CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
To: hosepipe
Dielectic AgnosticismDon't you mean dyslexic?
(Rimshot)
To: hosepipe
Did you see their Corn producing Corn is speciation argument?
Might look at it, wouldn't want anyone to miss the best sideshow on FR right now.. lol.
925 posted on
02/14/2006 3:00:43 PM PST by
Havoc
(Evolutionists and Democrats: "We aren't getting our message out" (coincidence?))
To: hosepipe
Yeah, dialectical Agnosticism. Funny.
One of my papers as an undergrad was about the convergence of Marx Darwin Nietche Freud Jung in the same pre Azusa Street time period.
These "Scientists" comprised a fake intellectual juggernaut of unbelief that helped foster in the greatest murder of people in one century than in all the previous centuries before in all the wars ever fought.
More people died for the ideas of Marx than any other cause in the history of mankind.
Nazi deaths were but a blip on the screen compared to the Marxist slaughter. in the name of atheism.
Darwin's theory, while not directly tied to Marxism in any other way in which you stated -- "one thing they know for sure, it's NOT God" -- was just an erosion of faith in Christians who failed to be pro-actively intellectual and took apologetics as seriously as Paul tells us to.
Once you demean human life, it is much easier to murder.
Wonder how many Evolutionists are proLife?
932 posted on
02/14/2006 3:16:01 PM PST by
Californiajones
("The apprehension of beauty is the cure for apathy" - Thomas Aquinas)
To: hosepipe; betty boop; TXnMA
Pity that modern science is in such state of PC..
Of a truth, science ought to be free of all ideological presuppositions - otherwise, how can we be confident in the results?
Thank you for your post!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson