[Californiajones]

No, it wold be the same natural or supernatural process to make something more complex out of something less complex -- as it would to make something out of nothing -- because you would be dealing with the same creative process in both cases.

So, until Evolutionists can create something out of nothing, their "science" means nothing.

[Dimensio]

No, it wold be the same natural or supernatural process to make something more complex out of something less complex -- as it would to make something out of nothing -- because you would be dealing with the same creative process in both cases.

Justify this claim.

So, until Evolutionists can create something out of nothing, their "science" means nothing.

Non-sequitur. You have failed utterly to explain why evolution must demonstrate something from nothing when the theory does not claim that any such thing has ever happened.

[Right Wing Professor]

So, until Evolutionists can create something out of nothing, their "science" means nothing.

Spoken bravely for a man who believes in a hypothetical guy with a beard flying around above the clouds.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"No, it wold be the same natural or supernatural process to make something more complex out of something less complex -- as it would to make something out of nothing -- because you would be dealing with the same creative process in both cases."

No, it wouldn't be. Is the formation of a snowflake a supernatural processes?

" So, until Evolutionists can create something out of nothing, their "science" means nothing."

Again, an ignorant strawman argument.