To: Havoc
"Dog is a classification the public is fully aware of."
The public is wrong. *Dog* consist of a number of different species.
" Just because you want to hide doesn't mean we have to let you."
This is hysterical!
"You aren't getting away with it and you know it and it's eating you up."
Projection is a bitch.
"They're all dogs. Caught on yet, or do you need a picture?"
So a fox is the same *kind* as a chihuahua?
880 posted on
02/14/2006 2:15:35 PM PST by
CarolinaGuitarman
("There is grandeur in this view of life...")
To: CarolinaGuitarman
Dog is a type of animal. If you want to define Great dane and
bulldog as differing species, that's your problem, not mine.
I understand how the textbooks and scientists have made their deliniations, that's part of the argument. It's a dog. Until you establish something other than a dog, you don't have a change in species - you have a variation within it. You want to say Dog is a family level label - fine. All you're really saying is that there is a disconnect between science and common sense. I've already made that point. Next.
883 posted on
02/14/2006 2:19:33 PM PST by
Havoc
(Evolutionists and Democrats: "We aren't getting our message out" (coincidence?))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson