[CarolinaGuitarman]

"Dogs and wolves. Wolves are dogs. Splain yourself. Right - can't. Next inanity."

Yes, your point is inane.

"Corn is being used as a generic for a species just as "Dog" is here."

And it's incorrect to do so. *Corn* doesn't mean species any more than *dog* does.

"Corn is corn. When it becomes something not-corn you got macro (species). Until then it's micro (breed)."

No. YOU don't get to make up the definitions of species because it suits you. There are a number of species of corn.

[Havoc]

Dog is a classification the public is fully aware of. So is Corn. Just because you want to hide doesn't mean we have to let you. Swat and throw a tantrum. I don't care. You aren't getting away with it and you know it and it's eating you up.
Swat at me all you will, this stuff is why you're a fraud it the eyes of rational human beings called the "general public" who may not have degrees but have the sense given a rock to know a dog from a non-dog and corn from non-corn.

Complex things are not so complex that they cannot be simplified to make people understand them. And in most cases, they'll simplify it themselves when they do. They don't need five latin words to say corn. If you do, that's your problem.