To: Stultis
"At which time there were humans all over the globe. You can't cherry pick one little itty bit of the archaeological evidence and ignore everything else."
Which time was that? I don't recall naming a time. The evidence that I referenced suggests a flood between 25 and 30,000 years ago. Molecular anthropologists are coming to believe that homo sapiens sapiens originated in one location between 40 and 60,000 years ago.
83 posted on
02/12/2006 1:04:08 PM PST by
N2Gems
To: N2Gems
Molecular anthropologists are coming to believe that homo sapiens sapiens originated in one location between 40 and 60,000 years ago.LOL! You're missing a zero, Bud. (And it's as much as 700,000 years.)
87 posted on
02/12/2006 1:07:53 PM PST by
Stultis
(I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
To: N2Gems
Which time was that? I don't recall naming a time. The evidence that I referenced suggests a flood between 25 and 30,000 years ago.I assumed you had in mind the Black Sea flood, about 7,000 years ago. But 25-30 works (or doesn't work) too. There were well established human populations far from the Middle East, and long had been, at that time too.
91 posted on
02/12/2006 1:12:01 PM PST by
Stultis
(I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
To: N2Gems
Molecular anthropologists are coming to believe that homo sapiens sapiens originated in one location between 40 and 60,000 years ago.
Interesting that humans would be able to leave Africa roughly fifty thousand years before they came to exist. Which molecular anthropologists are you talking with? Source, please.
95 posted on
02/12/2006 1:20:34 PM PST by
aNYCguy
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson