"Are these the same scientists that accept the "scientific" studies relating to secondhand smoke?"
Do you see anything here about smoking? If not, what does your post have to do with this topic? Do you actually have anything to add to the debate over ID?
>>Do you see anything here about smoking?
Don't say the word smoking!!
Oops, I said smoking!
Dah! I said it again!
I'm gonna go take a shower, I smell like a long thin tube of paper filld with a weed, and set alight after this thread... < / Humor >
CarolinaGuitarmanDo you see anything here about smoking? If not, what does your post have to do with this topic? Do you actually have anything to add to the debate over ID?
From the article: But there are many established facts concerning evolution, according to R.C. Lewontin, Alexander Agassiz Professor Emeritus of Zoology at Harvard University. He, as do virtually all biological scientists, agree that it is a fact that the Earth with liquid water has been around for more than 3.6 billion years and that cellular life has been around for at least half of that period.
And I won't add anything to the ID debate either. I just want to throw in to the mix that Lewontin is an uber-Marxist who also believes the scientific community should be running the world. He's a jerk! And furthermore,. he has to live with a dichotomy of Wilson having a very viable theory evolution operating within sociobiology which conflicts with the pseudo-egalitarianism the PC at Harvard hold as a sacrament. So there. ;=P
Anyway, while I'm being annoying, I will say this whole debate has made me start to jump deeper in to science books and videos from the library, and I commend the evos for sparking my interest and helping me to learn some things-I checked out a book about John Nash and his work that is very interesting so far! I still hold open the possibility of outside forces being in play not because of the field of biology, but more from the unanswered, wonderous questions astrophysics brings forth.