This is a perfect example -- "LGLO" is rather dinosaur as far as understanding of comparative genomics.
But because a number of years ago some prosyletite wrote up some tract with it as an example, that's about all anyone here knows about.
You stay in your box.
Five minutes ago you didn't know what it was. Now you're pretending to have enough knowledge of it to claim it's old hat and passé. You can see, surely, why your credibility is, ahem, somewhat risible.
However, we can look at the molecualr phylogeny of the sequence in detail, if you like.