While I both agree with the concept of evolution and hold that God created the universe, the arguments put forth in this article against irreduceable complexity are a steaming load of hog crap. Or perhaps more properly, bringing a peashooter to a gun match. The author speaks of the lack of evidence put forth by intelligent design proponents and then gives precious little himself (indeed, I've seen far bettter arguments made by intelligent design proponents).
They simply do not address what I think are some interesting proposals put forth by evolutionary biologists and creationists alike.
"They simply do not address what I think are some interesting proposals put forth by evolutionary biologists and creationists alike."
It's pretty obvious from reading the article that the writer did not attempt to gather any data except from evolutionist believers.