[tallhappy]

I see. When faced with something you think is harmful to your world view (it's not) you go to insult and attack.

What possibly can contradict evolution?

And, why is your definition of evolution different than that of the author of this article?

I said there is no other scientific explanation that explains the facts.

Yes. You don't seem to understand what you are saying. And, credit to you for using fact correctly.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"I see. When faced with something you think is harmful to your world view (it's not) you go to insult and attack."

No, when faced with someone who blatantly lies about what I said, I call them on it. I never even implied that there was no conceivable evidence that could go against the TOE. I said that there are no scientific alternatives. ID isn't a scientific alternative.

" What possibly can contradict evolution?"

An animal giving birth to a different class of animal.

" And, why is your definition of evolution different than that of the author of this article?"

It isn't.

" Yes. You don't seem to understand what you are saying. And, credit to you for using fact correctly."

You don't seem to be able to read. When someone says there is no other scientific explanation that fits the facts, that doesn't mean that there are no conceivable facts that could contradict the TOE. For someone who has pretensions to deep logical skills, you sure do like to wallow in logical missteps.