To: PatrickHenry
Great article! As you say, this pretty much sums it all up. When you look for logical reasons why anyone would take an anti-evolution stance, all possibilities are truly sinister. Willful ignorance, superstitious brainwash, or charlatan exploitation of either or all of the above. There's no other logic for an anti-evolution stance!
329 posted on
02/13/2006 6:40:15 AM PST by
shuckmaster
(An oak tree is an acorns way of making more acorns)
To: shuckmaster
Right, none, no possible reason other than everyone smells it amd most don't want it. No reason whatsoever. lol
332 posted on
02/13/2006 7:09:16 AM PST by
Havoc
(Evolutionists and Democrats: "We aren't getting our message out" (coincidence?))
To: shuckmaster
"
There's no other logic for an anti-evolution stance!"
Great comment! Well that pretty much sums it up. Willful ignorance, indeed.
Ignorance by the Darwinists, that is, an obdurate unwillingness to see and understand the other side's aguments and to mock.
Of course the same willing blindness allows a Darwinist the liberty to continue beleiving in Darwinism. It's a niche, a niche for those of that type of blindered intellect, whether blindered by choice or by native limits to ability.
344 posted on
02/13/2006 7:46:40 AM PST by
bvw
To: shuckmaster; PatrickHenry; CarolinaGuitarman; andysandmikesmom
Here's Dick Morris on Hillary Clinton (as reported today on FR, "How Anger Wounds Hilll").
Hillary takes her political positions very seriously and personally. She has a hard time seeing virtue in those who disagree with her.
350 posted on
02/13/2006 8:11:55 AM PST by
bvw
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson