[CarolinaGuitarman]

"Explain one thing, why would he need to put fact in quotes?"

For people like you. Now, what are the canards in the article?

[tallhappy]

For people like you. Now, what are the canards in the article?

Talk about evasion!! Guitarman, tune thyself.

Here is one that has two major problems:

Biologists have not observed one species of animal or plant changing quickly into a far different one. If they did, it would be evidence against evolution.

First, "one species of animal or plant changing quickly into a far different one" would in no way be evidence against evolution.

Two, let's assume it was evidence against, not seeing it ("one species of animal or plant changing quickly into a far different one") is not supportive of evolution nor evidence for it.

So two major problems, first it is just wrong biologically. Second the logic is flawed even if it were not biologically wrong.