[OrthodoxPresbyterian]

I don't. Contracts need to be, as they are, subject to the rules of the state.

Actually, Contract is Antecedent and Predent to the State.

(Please advance a Theory of Governance which does not recognize the Theory of Contract as Antecedent).

Unconscionable contracts must be voidable simply because not all contracts are entered into after arms-length negotiations.

If you're referring to "youths", "incompetents", "invalids", and etc., you're arguing Hard Cases against Principle. Hard Cases make Bad Law.

Start at the Beginning. (Please advance a Theory of Governance which does not recognize the Theory of Contract as Antecedent)

Best, OP

[OrthodoxPresbyterian]

Actually, Contract is Antecedent and Predent Precedent to the State

Mea Culpa; proceed from my correction.

[jude24]

Start at the Beginning. (Please advance a Theory of Governance which does not recognize the Theory of Contract as Antecedent)

Well, that's asking a bit much. My theory of Contract is that contracts freely entered into are presumptively valid, but where there is a gross disparity in power or in benefit, the beneficiary party bears the burden of demonstrating that the contract is valid.