Replies

It's OK, I know quite well what you are.

Okay, hotshot. Me-um just a dumb Creationist, You-um biggum smart-type guy.

Since you know me so well, howzabout you explain the differences between Rushdoony's Calvinist Reconstructionism and Nymeyer's Calvinist Theonomic Libertarianism. Heck, I'll even make it easy, and allow you to provide explanations on three hot-button Issues:

1.) Abortion
2.) Homosexuality (with reference to Same-Sex Marriage)
3.) Pornography (or "Drug Policy"; I'll allow Professor's Choice on Number Three).

I know this: you Evolutionist-Materialists have NEVER YET managed to make it past Pasteur's Law of Biogenesis; but when it comes to establishing the very basis for your Atheistic Speculations, the utterly-unproven (and indeed, entirely-unevidenced) Hypothesis of Chemical Abiogenesis...

...Y'all AREN'T SHY AT ALL about coercively employing the Power of the State to steal OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY in order to enforce upon OTHER PEOPLE'S CHILDREN the unproven Speculations of your Atheistic Religion.

So I know that -- about Pasteur's Law, and your Failure to Disprove it.
Now what did you know about me? I'm giving you three hot-button Issues; prove how much you "know quite well what you are" about me.

Put your Mouth where your Hubris is, kemosabe.

Best, OP

Since you know me so well, howzabout you explain the differences between Rushdoony's Calvinist Reconstructionism and Nymeyer's Calvinist Theonomic Libertarianism

How about I don't?

Why the heck would I be interested in detailing the minutiae distinguishing the Galilean's Pleople' Liberation Front from the People's Front for the Liberation of Galilee? Once we've established the premise that the Laws of the United States are to be brought into conformity with Biblical law, the details are, in my mind, unimportant. It's an abhorrent idea, contrary to the US Constitution and principles on which this country was founded, and, assuming it ever gets beyond the theocratic fringe, will be fought with no quarter given.