[CarolinaGuitarman]

"I was scaring you into denying the evidence of the physical world with eternal damnation?"

You have never scared me for one second. :)

" I don't want to scare you out of looking at the physical world by threatening you with eternal damnation."

I look at it all the time. It's creationists who refuse to accept it.

" He loves us. He made this. He made us. Sorry. That's my "theory" and I'm sticking to it. S'what Einstein saw, too."

Einstein didn't believe in a personal God.

"So, take a Kierkegaardian leap out of the infinite dopey loop of Evolution, bro."

I don't need to, there is plenty of evidence to support evolution. And, unlike you, I am not ignorant enough to think that every scientific theory needs to be encapsulated in a single formula. So, you go believe your little fantasies and your wildly ignorant ideas about what science is supposed to be, and I'll continue analyzing the scientific evidence for evolution. Which is enormous.

[Californiajones]

"So, you go believe your little fantasies and your wildly ignorant ideas about what science is supposed to be, and I'll continue analyzing the scientific evidence for evolution. Which is enormous."

But apparently not enormous enough to evidence here in chemical formulae.

I am dazzled by the obfuscation.

Again, if evolutionary "theory" is indeed a process, then it is a chemical one.

What is its basic formula?

Go ahead and ridicule me personally all you want, but my question remains unanswered. And I believe it is unanswered because Evos don't want to prove that there is a scientific basis for their theory; they just like languishing in the thought that Christianity is vanquished by Darwin's quackery.

And whether Einstein's God was personal or deist, it was a creator God of the whole universe.