Not brilliant, as you asked. Aged relative problems. :( But I try to keep smiling and get my spirits back up by giving illogic and the rejection of observed reality a good kicking on FR. :)
Even that one doesn't qualify depending on how you wrap your mind around it.
OK. I get the following possibilities.
I still say that the serious contenders are 1 and 2, so we should be agreed that life has appeared on earth from non-life at least once, and that the argument is natural versus supernatural origination.
BTW, you haven't yet answered my questions about the nature of stars. Do you accept that stars are hot balls of fusing gas, inconceivably far away?
I missed the question about the stars. Sometimes, though, in the middle of these discussions with more than a few participants firing questions and comments, things get missed.
The evidence seems to indicate that your definition of star is adequate.