To: b_sharp
Note that code reuse is no different from common descent (of the codes.)
2,171 posted on
02/18/2006 6:33:34 PM PST by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: Doctor Stochastic
Note that code reuse is no different from common descent (of the codes.)Hey, that's good!
2,172 posted on
02/18/2006 6:53:22 PM PST by
PatrickHenry
(Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
To: Doctor Stochastic
"Note that code reuse is no different from common descent (of the codes.) Must be that upstart C++.
2,179 posted on
02/18/2006 9:42:14 PM PST by
b_sharp
(Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
To: Doctor Stochastic; b_sharp
Note that code reuse is no different from common descent (of the codes.) Yepp, however there are also different ways in which code can be reused.
For some strange reason this ominous designer only reuses code that's been inherited from previous versions but never code from other unrelated 'source code' which means that he has to "reinvent the wheel" quite often.
In other words, if you look at the work of this "designer" you get a treelike structure whereas if you examine the way humans usually design things, you get more of a spider's web.
2,199 posted on
02/19/2006 7:30:50 AM PST by
BMCDA
(If the human brain were so simple that we could understand it,we would be so simple that we couldn't)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson