"I see you chose nothing. Start anywhere.
You begin. Come on."
You're the one who said the article was full of canards. It's your burden to substantiate this claim. Or else redraw your claim. Stop playing games and get to it. :)
Here: Scientists consider a "fact" to be something that has been confirmed to such a degree of reliability and logic that it would be absurd to think otherwise.
This is absolute rubbish.