Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: P-Marlowe
"But it denies the relevance of God."

No scientific theory has anything pro or con to say about God. ALL scientific theories use only naturalistic, testable claims. If you have a beef, take it up with all of science, because that is what you are arguing against.

" One cannot deny the relevance of God while at the same time claim to worship him."

Is the proposition of God needed to explain the movement of atoms? The planets? If so, how does one include God into the equations?

" I have little or no respect for so-called "Christian Evolutionists"."

I am sure the feeling is mutual. :)
1,834 posted on 02/17/2006 10:20:46 AM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1829 | View Replies ]


To: CarolinaGuitarman; xzins; OrthodoxPresbyterian
Is the proposition of God needed to explain the movement of atoms? The planets?

From a theological perspective, yes it is. We can learn of God through his creation. The laws of the universe were declared by God. God created the universe out of nothing and stretched it out across the heavens. In him all things subsist.

Thus saith God the LORD, he that created the heavens, and stretched them out; he that spread forth the earth, and that which cometh out of it; he that giveth breath unto the people upon it, and spirit to them that walk therein: (Isaiah 42:5 KJV)

I'm sure you don't believe any of that.

1,845 posted on 02/17/2006 10:34:52 AM PST by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1834 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson