To: CarolinaGuitarman; jude24; xzins; Ichneumon; PatrickHenry; Dr. Eckleburg
No, I am correct. I said that EVEN IF atheism were a religion, it wouldn't matter, because evolution isn't atheistic. How did you counter that? You said that atheism was a religion... blah blah blah. Hello! That doesn't rebut my argument. Not even a little. Why? Because evolution ISN"T ATHEISTIC. :)If you admit that Atheism is Religionist, that only buttresses my point.
My point is, Evolutionism is the preferred "Creation Myth" of Atheistic-Religionism.
Atheistic-Religionism therefore enjoys a $500-Billion-per-year Government Establishment and Subsidy over and against all other Religions, via the "Evolutionist-Only" Publik-Skools.
You Evolutionists don't want to give that up.
That's not surprising. State-Established Religions DON'T want to give up their Government-Subsidized Advantages.
"(even though Christianity is a subject you know little or nothing about)" ~~ ASSume much? I went to Catholic school K-12.
So.... you're the lapsed Prodigal Son of a Denomination which hasn't gotten hardly a single thing right about Christianity since Thomas Aquinas, who died 800 years ago.
And you still presume to lecture others on whether or not they are "Un-Christian"?
Um... Okay.
1,752 posted on
02/17/2006 7:12:24 AM PST by
OrthodoxPresbyterian
(We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty - Luke 17:10)
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
"If you admit that Atheism is Religionist, that only buttresses my point."
No, it doesn't, because evolution isn't atheistic. :)
"So.... you're the lapsed Prodigal Son of a Denomination which hasn't gotten hardly a single thing right about Christianity since Thomas Aquinas, who died 800 years ago."
Ah, you're an anti-Catholic bigot too. Not surprised.
"And you still presume to lecture others on whether or not they are "Un-Christian"?"
Yes, because you have not been acting very Christian. Lying and rudeness aren't in accordance with ANY denomination of Christianity.
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
My point is, Evolutionism is the preferred "Creation Myth" of Atheistic-Religionism. Then that's a stupid point. Atheism doesn't have a "creation myth." To the atheist, the secular, scientific explanation for the cause of the diversity of life on Earth is acceptable. That doesn't make it a myth nor particularly religious. They simply see no need to invent some invisible entity to explain life's diversity, as you apparently do.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson