Permit me to be of assistance. Rule number one -- when your first entry into a thread, which is over 1600 posts long, is this:
yeah, for anyone who blindly accepts what the Evo scientific community hands to them. It sickens me that any scientist who supports creationism, and or ID is automatically discounted by you evo Nazis as "A liar" or "someone who doesn't understand science", .. or several other general assumptions, as a matter of fact the only people you count as actual scientist, are supporters of evolution. When a point is argued, it is said, "bring me something from someplace other than a Creationist source" what do you expect, for us to bring support for creation from an evolutionist? That very concept is moronacy. I realize that to control the source is to control the conversation, but your control of the source is absolutely the most clear cut case of close minded thinking I have ever seen displayed. And here I thought science was supposed to be about open minded study to find the truth, not Communist methods of controlling peoples ability to question your small minded concepts. You do not fool anyone, just because you try to set the rules for a debate, that doesn't make you right, nor does it make the ABSOLUTE LIE of evolution true. Knowing that most of you closed minded evo morons will now proceed to attack my character, and intelligence, I may or may not return your post, depending upon the respect with which you respond to mine.you may expect that you will be treated in accordance with the standard of discourse that you yourself have set.
As for me, I usually abide by my tagline, which I have found to be an excellent guide for participating in these threads. So I doubt that you'll be getting many posts from me.
wahhhhh you called me a name. How mature.