Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Californiajones
However, you failed to answer the question as to how much water, as in cubic measurements would it take to carve out the Grand Canyon?

I can't be bothered to work it out, and I don't see the relevance of the question. What it doesn't look remotely like is the result of any kind of sudden event like a damburst or flood. Apart from the meanders there are angular unconformities in the rocks it cuts through, which completely falsifies any notion that it could have formed rapidly through soft sediments.

1,541 posted on 02/15/2006 3:15:40 PM PST by Thatcherite (More abrasive blackguard than SeaLion or ModernMan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1532 | View Replies ]


To: Thatcherite

The relevance of the question about water in the Grand Canyon is that it was an enormous body of water moving through there at one time. I'm curious as to how geology accounts for this fact. That's why I was thinking about it and posted it.


1,545 posted on 02/15/2006 3:23:05 PM PST by Californiajones ("The apprehension of beauty is the cure for apathy" - Thomas Aquinas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1541 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson