Alright, fine, C-G -- since you declare that "The policy you want (abolition of government schools) isn't going to happen any time soon", and therefore as a Government-Subsidized, Publik-Skool-Dependent, Tax-Suckling Evolutionist Leech you are determined to a-go-on feasting upon the Stolen Tax-Dollars of hard-working Creationists, I shall engage you in a few of the "arguments" which you seek.
I will preface my arguments in advance by saying that ALL of this is beside the point entirely -- the Point is, Parents should have Financial Control over the Education of their Children, NOT THE STATE. Of course, given the overwhelming Parental support in America for the teaching of Creationism, true Parental Control over Educational Financing would result in the educational starvation of Evolutionism -- a wholly desirable result (but you evolutionists can't have that, now, can you?).
Well, then, let's have at it; evolution, geology, cosmology, radiometric dating -- since you are determined to fall back on the Argument "Educational Communism isn't going away, so why should we Evolutionist Educational-Communists give up our advantage?", what say we start with two -- JUST TWO -- little arguments, and go from there.
Evolutionism, an entirely unproven theory, begins from the fantastical Presumption that Life CAN arise from Non-Life (a primordial chemical muck -- i.e., "Double, double toil and trouble; Fire burn, and cauldron bubble", etc)... despite the fact that such a fantastical Presumption is against the Law of Science, and against 100% of the evidence from all probative laboratory experiments in history on the subject (all of which demonstrate that Life arises from Life, and never from Non-Life).
Given, then, that Pasteur's Scientific Law of Biogenesis has never been Disproved (or for that matter, even dented a little), and the fantastical Evolutionist Presumption of Random Chemical Abiogenesis has never been Proved (or for that matter, even Evidenced at all) -- why should the 13% Minority of the Population who blindly persist in believing in the INSANITY of Evolutionist Chemical Abiogenesis, against the evidence of hundreds of years of Scientific Law, have the right to use Public Tax-Dollars to IMPOSE their EVOLUTIONIST-SPECULATIONS upon the Majority of Parents and Children who (quite understandably), prefer to stick with Proven Creationists like Pasteur, rather than the unproven Speculations of the Darwinists?
We have already found fully-preserved soft organic tissue in the bones of dinosaurs, which are alleged to be "70 million years" old -- despite the fact that it is BIOCHEMICALLY-IMPOSSIBLE for soft organic tissues to last more than 100,000 years (let alone being still perfectly-preserved and elastic).
At this point, the Open-Minded Man (a term which, admittedly, automatically disqualifies the Evolutionist) would be compelled to admit the possibility -- if Dinosaur Bones CAN'T be more than 100,000 years old, then maybe they AREN'T 100,000 years old. I admit that the Close-Minded Evolutionist is unwilling to admit this possibility, but I must appeal to Arthur Conan Doyle: "Once you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, MUST be the Truth." ~~ Sherlock Holmes.
Alright, then, let's try TWO LITTLE ARGUMENTS, from the top:
Given that Life CANNOT arise from Non-Life (according to Scientific Law), and given that Dinosaur Bones CANNOT be more than 100,000 years old (according to Organic Biochemistry)... then why should the 13% Minority of the Population who blindly persist in believing in the INSANITY of Evolutionism, be permitted to deny the hard-working American Creationist Majority their Right to include competing Scientific Theories of Origins within their Schools?
It's our money, too, y'know... you Evolutionists just Steal it from us.
Best, OP