[Thatcherite]

Pretty broad generalization which doesn't account for what you don't know about the past. Partial evidence is an incomplete picture. While it is fair to comment on what you do find. Characterizing the past to exclude anything you haven't is rather like finding the first three pages of shogun and stating that's the book.. not much different than the example of the appendix earlier - dogmatizing a falsehood from ignorance of the truth..

Ah, so you do reject sciences other than evolution. Scientists had spotted that the creatures in the fossil record are not modern species long before Darwin wrote OoS. That finding is completely separate from any mechanism of evolution. Now, I wonder how much other science you reject? Still waiting for your answers about the rest of the list that I posted.

[Havoc]

Given my response, the only way you could come to that conclusion is if you view all of science as dogmatized falsehoods. Apparently, you do.