To: Havoc
one type of creature endlessly spawning different types of creatures. That is exactly what evolution requires. You just want to take exception over how long it might take or how blatent it is.
While it's very often impossible to make any sense out of your posts, I"ll take a shot at this one. (At least you weren't madly laughing your head off while posting it.)
Allow me to point out how utterly moronic your concept of "kinds" and "dogs having dogs." Do you then realize that the brand of evolution you accept (so-called "microevolution") actually far outpaces and is far more fantastic that what evolution actually "does?"
That is, in your little head, the "dog kind" (whatever that may be) somehow produced everything from dingos to wolves to poodles to hyenas, etc. In 6000 years, give or take. The irony here is that you accept evolution on a much faster and grander scale than science does.
And while we're talking, could you please define this "micro-evolution" you so readily accept? I'm curious as to when nature (or God) knows when to hit the button to stop it from becoming a so-called "macro" event.
To: whattajoke
Time scale doesn't seem to bother you guys till you need to beg credulity. One of your own here commented on this very thread about how very little time it took in modern times for many of the breeds of dog to appear. Pull the other one and get your story straight.
1,303 posted on
02/15/2006 2:03:27 AM PST by
Havoc
(Evolutionists and Democrats: "We aren't getting our message out" (coincidence?))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson