"Do you really want to go there? My experience is shared by millions, perhaps over a billion, who will die for their 'knowledge'."
Sure, I'll go there.
You're talking anecdotes, not research.
Back to my original point, these definitions won't work for the reasons I cite. So if the poster's intention is to create a set of terms that we can all agree on for a decent dialogue, he needs to rethink it. I don't usually chime in on these threads because they never go anywhere productive, I'm just trying to be helpful.
Of course, I'm not really sure if that's what he wants, or if he just wants to have a big circle jerk with the evo crowd.
But look, you can certainly shoot down anything I say, because it happened to someone else. That's the nature of faith. Or 'knowledge'.
So what are you going to say when it happens to you?
Well, you're the one who brought up sample size, as if that was the problem. Now it's not the size of the sample, it's the conten. When content was my original point, you brought up sample size!