[b_sharp]

"The Marxists-Freudian-Darwinists only respond to old arguments, and, as we have seen, are quick to call others "racists", where it is Darwinists of the past century who defined racism as a science, and Marxists who cleverly expanded the term to include ethnocentrism and just about anything, but to associate the "racist" (that's the cleverness of it) with Dr Mengele. (Look up the term in a dictionary from the 1940s, before you use it next time.)

As far as I can tell we are discussing the ToE and the observation of evolution in action.

How a typically idiotic Ad Hominen argument is supposed to provide evidence against 'Darwinism' or 'Neo-Darwinism' as the Creatinoids so ineloquently put it, is beyond the believable. If you have this much trouble separating the putative use of the observed variation in species to commit atrocities from the scientific use of the theory and process perhaps you should refrain from participating in any argument.

[Revolting cat!]

As far as I can tell we are discussing the ToE and the observation of evolution in action.

Then you should perhaps flame your fellow "racism" obsessed Evofanatic who changed the subject long before my arrival?