While I don't agree that research has settled anything (in the same way, research can show global warming or no global warming) it is to me, beside the point. It doesn't have to be genetic for a child to grow up to be a homosexual anymore than being left handed is genetic. While, I don't think anecdotes are a good form of proof for anything, one personal one has always left me wondering. We had friends with 4 sons. The third son started showing female or effeminate characteristics as soon as he was able to walk. He saw Wizard of Oz and wanted to dress like Dorothy. He would spend a great deal of time selecting clothes and making sure he was always dressed well. He always wanted to play with girls and play girl games. He simply exhibited a lot of behavior that suggested to me and to his parents (who were mortified) that he was gay. All the other sons behaved like typical boys. Sure enough, as soon as he reached puberty he showed an interest in boys and grew up to be homosexual. Now, you can't tell me that at the age of 3 this child chose to be a homosexual, because he had no clue what sex was. I'm not suggesting all homosexuals begin the process at 3 or that some men don't make a deliberate choice to be gay. I think for some men it just happens, whether it is genetic or not. Furthermore, I don't care if they are homosexual or not. It means nothing to me one way or another.
You're presenting your own philosophy, as if it's the discussion.
Although it's interesting reading, it's mere personal philosophy. That being the case, it's philosopy, to repeat that, that reflects the current cultural stance of the "homosexual agenda" -- an atempt to enforce personal perspectives as if they were facts, (not you but the agenda itself, which is what many of us on FR and elsewhere object to), to demand that public education include their philosophy as fact in discussing homosexuality, to omit the facts about it (it's not immutable and the attempts to make it so are mere philosophical, if not wishful thinking).
I can no more tell you that your philosophy is right nor wrong. But it's entirely subjective given that it's not supported by scientific fact, that "homosexuality is...(not chosen, is not behavioral)."
I've heard/read your stories before and you can write them here till doomsday but it will still represent the homosexual agenda and not fact.
You believe the agenda, you believe what you're told, you think that parents who conclude homosexual children "were born that way" or just became homosexual and that it's to be accepted as "natural," and more...and you earlier objected to others having referred to morality when no one has (not me), so, what I think it is is you want to insist your philosophy is, in fact, "more right" than others here.
All I can say is the thread has been a lengthy one in an attempt to discuss the facts of the article, not your personal philosophy.
Homosexuality is not equatable with being left handed or red haired or similar. It's sad that you've resigned yourself to conclude it's that minor a thing in another human being. However, I'm just not interested in discussing the homosexual agenda here with you nor anyone.
I do know that promoting the homosexual agenda is regarded on FR as an offensive behavior, so, and many will identify you as trolling if you continue with this.