Go read your own comments. You expressed yourself, YOU wrote that, in feigned question, as to "natural, lesbian" behavior.
No one else did that. You did. Go read the thread.
People, including me, confronted the sly misleadment -- there's nothing "natural" about homosexuality -- and you peaked.
So, share with us later your contact with the CDC because it would be interesting how they respond, as to your suggestions that the male homosexual community didn't introduce the virus that causes AIDS to the general population.
I'll write this again and that is that I've already and many times written to you that the virus has existed prior to infecting the human population and continues to exist among other species. It's a case of which incident of the virus infected the human population and the CDC, as have others, have long since established and traced the DNA of the virus that actually crossed the species barrier back to PATIENT GROUND ZERO.
How HE acquired it, again, has never been traced to the general population. Thus, that one particular male homosexual both became infected by unknown individual or process (no one with his particuarl viral strain has been identified as having it prior to having intimate contact with him and thus, whoever infected him was almost certainly one person who died soon after or went into some sort of isolation from the human species afterward and has since died) infected the general population afterward.
Go read your own comments. You expressed yourself, YOU wrote that, in feigned question, as to "natural, lesbian" behavior.
--
AFTER someone else mention natural/unnatural. I was using what people refer to as reducto ad absurdem. The poster had stated that evidence for the unnaturalness of homosexuality was that male homosexuals got AIDS more than heterosexuals. I then ASKED him if that meant lesbianism was more natural as they get AIDS LESS often than heterosexuals. I never said that homosexuality was natural or unnatural. Indeed, I have stated a number of times that I dont care. Indeed, I havent seen anyone actual say what they mean by natural or unnatural in the contexts of human behaviour.
---
I'll write this again and that is that I've already and many times written to you that the virus has existed prior to infecting the human population and continues to exist among other species. It's a case of which incident of the virus infected the human population and the CDC, as have others, have long since established and traced the DNA of the virus that actually crossed the species barrier back to PATIENT GROUND ZERO
--
Except that the CDC website doesnt agree with you. Their website makes no mention of the fact that human HIV infection has been traced back to one individual. Indeed, their website states that they do not know HOW the earliest **known** infection victim (a man in Kinsasha) was infected. Did you actually go look at the website that I gave you? I will give it to you one more time
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pubs/faq/faq3.htm
Please, read it.