[Bubbatuck]

It doesn't destroy the argument that people who aren't hurting anyone else ought to be left alone.

Good for you, and good luck. I tried making that argument here awhile back and was accused of everything this side of mother-raping. I agree with you. It used to be libs that were concerned with what everybody else was doing. Now it's so-called conservatives.

[Sweetjustusnow]

"It doesn't destroy the argument that people who aren't hurting anyone else ought to be left alone."

"It used to be libs that were concerned with what everybody else was doing. Now it's so-called conservatives."

Oh Cont-rare. It isn't Conservatives who give a rat's butt what homo's do in their private lives, it is when the homo's demand a status that separates themselves from the rest of us and trys to force others into excepting their behavior as being akin to heterosexual. It is the homosexuals who are in everybody's face.

[JTN]

It used to be libs that were concerned with what everybody else was doing. Now it's so-called conservatives.

Reagan is buried in the ground and forgotten. People like wagglebee march to the beat of Rick Santorum's drum.

[brytlea]

There is a difference between leaving people alone to do as they will, and codifying it into law via homosexual marriage.


susie

[gidget7]

We don't care what they do, except to feel sorry for them and pray for them. We don't care either, to make what they want to do or not do illegal. However, we do care about them forcing the teaching of it as normal and healthy in schools. And we do care about forcing of acceptance, and forcing of endorsement.

Legal and accepted are two very different things!! For instance, adultery is not illegal, however, we do not condone it, or accept it as acceptable behavior. And the government is not being as to make a law requiring spouses to accept it as a state of legal recognition!