"Occam's Razor has been dulled by fallacies of logic. Sharpened up, it would tell you the drive to mate in mammals and other sexually reproducing organisms is biologically heterosexual."
Occam's Razor is a sharp as it ever was. Occam's Razor states, "That when faced with a number of possible explanations, the simplest one is usually the correct one."
Now, for your statement,
""My opinion of Concerned Women of America, like a lot of other groups tied to television evangelism, is probably afflicted with "True Believer Syndrome", an inability to accept alternate explanations.""
"An ad hominem fallacy you can't use on an atheist like myself..."
I have a very low opinion of television evangelists, considering them to be the 'scum of the earth'. Why? It seems they are always trying to frighten people into making very large contributions to the television evangelist's coffers. In other words, the television evangelists are nothing but common grifters, con artists.
It has seemed the most appropriate form of address for a television evangelist is, "Reverend Scumbag".
" It seems they are always trying to frighten people into making very large contributions to the television evangelist's coffers."
A lot like research scientists trying to scare up grant money, come to think of it.
Using categorical logic, that would preclude any genetic component, as you had claimed.
Occam's Razor when wielded by William Shakespeare was a two edged blade:
“Who is he that is not of woman born?” (Macbeth)
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
I have a very low opinion of television evangelists, considering them to be the 'scum of the earth'.
It is still an ad hominem, informal fallacy of logic.
Mosaic Law is something both the pagan Islamic thugs and New Age Neo-Pagan Left cannot abide and wish to destroy. (Moses wrote Genesis.) This is why such people as yourself will jump up and down screaming when the Ten Commandments are displayed or the Creationist idea of monogamy from the Book of Genesis is introduced.
The latter (Genesis) also ruins the illogical and non-biological arguments of homosexual monogamy. In a secular sense, homosexuality is an idolatry of perversion. It is in no way an anatomical function of the human organism, but a phantasmagoric creation from within the mentally disturbed human mind, a social psychosis, naked and on full exhibitionist display here in the topic of this thread.
This is the whole crux of your attack on the religionists - - you are really frustrated by Genesis, but cannot destroy the axiomatic state of procreant human biology, it does not fit your religious agenda.
Homosexual monogamy advocates seek ceremonious sanctification of their anatomical perversions and esoteric absolution for their guilt-ridden, impoverished egos. Neither of those will satisfy their universal dissatisfaction with mortality or connect them to something eternal. With pantheons of fantasies as their medium of infinitization, they still have nothing in them of reality, no more than there is in the things that seem to stand before us in a dream.
Homosexual deviancy is really a pagan practice (and a self induced social psychosis) at war with the Judaic culture over what is written in the book of Genesis (1:27, 2:18).
Many will seek ceremonious sanctification and esoteric absolution in some type of marriage rite, but that still fails to give them a connection to the eternal in both a religious and temporal, procreant sense - - the union does not produce offspring.
Dissatisfaction with inevitable mortality only feeds the impoverishment of the ego further. Homosexuals really hate human life, their whole desire is rooted in the destruction of it...
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
Today, "morals" are defined by a quasi-religious pagan philosophy based on esoteric hobgoblins. A greater number of "atheists" and "pagans" adopt the same hackneyed tenets of a false Judaic-Christian ideal (golden calf). They also subscribe to the Judaic fetishism of "sin," but will fight to their death in denial of it. Most of them are so wrapped up in their own polemics that they have become nothing more than pathetic anti-Christians with the same false hypocritical philosophy. They just slap a new label on it hoping nobody will notice - - they replace the idea of "avoiding sin" with "morals."
Morality and all of its associated concepts are from the belief some higher power defines what is correct in human behavior. Today, "morals" are a religious pagan philosophy of esoteric hobgoblins. Transfiguration is a pantheon of fantasies as the medium of infinitization. Others get derision for having an unwavering Judaic belief in Yahweh or Yeshua, although their critics and enemies will evangelize insertion of phantasmagoric fetishisms into secular law.
Try an experiment. The next time you are confronted by a neo-pagan, New Age animal rights eco-fascist who claims humans were not "designed" or "meant" to eat animal flesh, ask them about the origin of their creationist philosophy. Inherent in such a claim is the idea that there is a "designer" or some divinity of "meaning" in human existence. Would they apply this to abortion, embryonic stem cells, or homosexuality? No?
The very idea that human beings have individual rights not subject to the whims of a monarch, but subject to the laws of Yahweh, is directly from Moses.
Historically, this is proven over and over again with the successive conflicts between the forces of paganism and the Judaic culture. It is being played out here and all over the world today...
Observing this as an atheist, I prefer the paradigm of a Judaic culture to the chaotic death cult of New Age neo-pagan absurdity.