This is not the same and you know it. He didn't adopt the kid, once you adopt a child it is yours. He accepted the child because he was TOLD by the mother is was his, he didn't accept it because he was being benevolent and taking on the support of another man's child, he was doing it because he believed the lie that it was his. Entirely different. You have your head squarely up your a** if you think other wise.
Is it exactly the same? No. It is mostly the same? Yes.
I'm pro-life for the same reasons. I think the life of the child is more important then the convenience of the parents. The consequences are a little less severe here for the child, but the same basic ideas apply.
And you have your head up your a$$ if you don't realize it.
Might want to read the article, on this particular case, the story isn't he was told it was his... he claims he was told it was his, she claims he was infertile and they found a donor together to have a child. While you might not like it, and its not common, her story is not implausible and has been done since people first walked the earth and will be done until they no longer exist.
This boils down at least from whats posted here as a he said/she said.
wow calex59, you sure are not a part of the folks who agree to disagree!
There is such a things as providence even though it seems not fair that person and this child some how were thrown togather and so if we are believer than should not for the sake of the situation do the right things, I think one would be blessed for it!
And saying unkind things are you not allowing your heart to harden?
Of course calex59 you have freewill you can do the letter of the Law or the worlds way, or you could choose to do the will of the Heavenly Creator and do the rigth thing?