Yes. While duped during the commission of fraud, under the mistaken assumption it was his child, he accepted responsibility.
Your argument will on hold water IF he knew it was not his in the beginning.
"Your argument will on hold water IF he knew it was not his in the beginning"
It still don't hold water.
See post #225
Nope -- he didn't. And according to the Abrams report, the wife continued to lie right on through the divorce proceedings. She didn't come clean at all.