Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: zbigreddogz
", but he accepted responsibility for it by calling it his own at birth. He's now accepted responsibility for the kid. "

Yes. While duped during the commission of fraud, under the mistaken assumption it was his child, he accepted responsibility.

Your argument will on hold water IF he knew it was not his in the beginning.

226 posted on 01/09/2006 9:52:44 AM PST by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: moehoward

"Your argument will on hold water IF he knew it was not his in the beginning"


It still don't hold water.

See post #225


231 posted on 01/09/2006 9:59:29 AM PST by Beagle8U (An "Earth First" kinda guy ( when we finish logging here, we'll start on the other planets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]

To: moehoward

Nope -- he didn't. And according to the Abrams report, the wife continued to lie right on through the divorce proceedings. She didn't come clean at all.


306 posted on 01/09/2006 2:49:47 PM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson