[Lurker]

Their attorney is about to get a lesson on what private, voluntary organizations can do with their membership requirements.

L

[moog]

I agree that the school has every right to enforce its own "membership requirements." I think the suit is ridiculous to put it mildly. I wonder what other behavior the girls did to make them "suspect." There's almost a funny irony here. I have long maintained that those who are not adults cannot properly decide if they are of any "alternative" sexual orientation. This almost seems to say that they can. I do hope that all the boys that may have a high voice or maybe some effeminate characteristics (then again I consider guys wearing earrings to be demonstrating this too) who are not "gay" don't get rounded up.

[HitmanLV]

Ultimately, folks backing any horse that includes being needlessly mean to gays will be winding up out of the money when the race is over.

Some matters, like the movement against same-sex marriage, will on balance be victorious (at least in the foreseeable future). Others that just have the impact of being mean to gays will be losers: there's no notable mandate among americans to be mean to anybody.

Throwing people out of school, or firing them from a job, just because they get sexually excited by some members of the same sex, is not a movement worth backing at all.

Just the truth, whether some Freepers like it or not.