To: P-Marlowe
The school board mandated reading a statement that asserted ID is a scientific alternative to evolution and that "Pandas" is an acceptable resource. The science teachers at Dover would never make these claims voluntarily. They are factually untrue and are motivated by the desire to promote a particular religious point of view.
2,178 posted on
12/22/2005 10:00:15 AM PST by
js1138
(Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
To: js1138; xzins; metmom; jude24; donh
The school board mandated reading a statement that asserted ID is a scientific alternative to evolution and that "Pandas" is an acceptable resource. The science teachers at Dover would never make these claims voluntarily. They are factually untrue and are motivated by the desire to promote a particular religious point of view. So what?
How is that "an establishment of religion" as prohibited in the first amendment?
Explain that.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson