Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: P-Marlowe
They should also pass a law that any decision of the Supreme Court in regard to the constitutionality of any law passed by the congress or the states shall be overturned by a 2/3 majority in the house and senate with approval of the President.

uh...aren't you pretty much describing the Amendment process already established by the Constitution?

2,106 posted on 12/22/2005 6:16:08 AM PST by donh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2104 | View Replies ]


To: donh
uh...aren't you pretty much describing the Amendment process already established by the Constitution?

The amendment process requires the approval of 3/4 of the states. Technically (and I believe constitutionally) you would not even need a 2/3 majority to overturn a decision of the Supreme Court, but I used the 2/3 majority as a benchmark to give a large measure of deference to the decisions of the Court. Nevertheless I believe congress has a right and an obligation to act as a check and balance against an overreaching judicial system.

2,107 posted on 12/22/2005 6:28:54 AM PST by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2106 | View Replies ]

To: donh; P-Marlowe

No, that alone is not the amendment process.

That also requires the agreement of 75% of the states.

A 2/3 majority is required in both houses to overturn a presidential veto...maybe that's what you were thinking of.


2,116 posted on 12/22/2005 6:52:59 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson