To: benjibrowder
"This was found in rock dating back 100,000,000 years, so the fossil is 100,000,000 million years!!! Is that not also circular reasoning?"
That's classical circular reasoning. In addition, evolution cannot explain the huge gaps in fossil records.
1,142 posted on
12/20/2005 2:51:42 PM PST by
Baraonda
(Demographic is destiny. Don't hire 3rd world illegal aliens nor support businesses that hire them.)
To: Baraonda
That's classical circular reasoning.
No, it isn't. If the rock's age is known beforehand, there is nothing circular about dating a fossil found in it based upon the rock. But then you're the idiot who thought that me stating "humans and monkeys share common ancestry" contradicted me stating "humans did not originate from monkeys", so I can understand that rationality and honesty are not your strong suits.
1,146 posted on
12/20/2005 2:53:22 PM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson