Apparently you are totally unfamiliar with the context (or willing to engage in willful equivocation for rhetorical value).
Einstein, in the "dice" quote, was suggesting that the most fundamental principles of physics could not be probabilistic, and therefore arguing (unsuccessfully then and to date as it turned out) that some more fundamental, and deterministic, theory must underlie quantum dynamics.
This has not a thing to do with evolution because all the principles relevant to evolution are several levels of explanation removed from the most fundamental principles of physics. E.g.: FUNDAMENTAL PHYSICS (relativity, QD, unified theories, fundamental forces, etc) ---> ATOMIC AND MOLECULAR PHYSICS ---> CHEMISTRY ---> BIOCHEMISTRY & FUNDAMENTAL BIOLOGY, biological process like respiration, replication, etc ---> GENETICS, population dynamics, etc ---> EVOLUTION.
Einstien was obviously aware that lower level, more fundamental, principles could underlie higher level principles that were propabilistic. After all, this was precisely what he was arguing wrt Quantum Dynamics. IOW he accepted that QD was valid in it's own right, and recognized that it was genuinely probablistic (i.e. not just misinterpreted that way), but thought there was a deterministic theory "beneath" it.
As another example Einstein himself proposed a probablistic theory in his explanation of Brownian Motion, which is at what I'm calling the "atomc and molecular physics" level.
It is sad, isn't it, that someone would try to discredit the proud state of Texas by trolling in its name.