[Dimensio]

Why do you presuppose they sprang from the womb fully formed?

This is the best that you have? Suggesting that energy, like biological life forms, goes through a developmental life cycle despite absolutely no similarities? This pathetic analogy is the best defense of your completely unsupported presuppositions that you have to offer?

[Havoc]

Similarities have zero to do with it. When you don't know, you can't rule out what you don't know. Yet you want to rule out anything you don't know that doesn't support your theory. That isn't science. And that is the core point. You aren't dealing with evidences, you're dealing with assumptions in place of evidence and modelling based on assumptions. That is the base point of your position - the weakest link. And at that level, your construct is only as good as your assumptions and then only one possible option in a pool of infinite possibility. You chose a fiction you liked and adopted it. Bully for you. But that isn't science.