Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Dimensio
Not a double standard. I didn't make an assumption there at all. I noted that his assumption of the absence of one changes the outcome of the bs he was shovelling. When you ultimately don't know the conditions, assuming the conditions only tells us what would be IF you were right. That's a pretty big IF. Amazing how you choose to construe it. Assuming light speed was constant - that was a major screwup on the part of science - one with far reaching consequence still being felt in the community. Accumulation rates for 14C were assumed constant - look where that got you. Seems it's only reasonable to you that everyone play stupid so you can have your way until you're proven utterly wrong again. What I find reasonable is saying "I don't know" when you don't know. But that doesn't make you look smart - apparently. I assume that's bad.
1,859 posted on 12/20/2005 2:08:52 AM PST by Havoc (President George and King George.. coincidence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1727 | View Replies ]


To: Havoc
"Not a double standard. I didn't make an assumption there at all. I noted that his assumption of the absence of one changes the outcome of the bs he was shovelling. When you ultimately don't know the conditions, assuming the conditions only tells us what would be IF you were right. That's a pretty big IF. Amazing how you choose to construe it. Assuming light speed was constant - that was a major screwup on the part of science - one with far reaching consequence still being felt in the community. Accumulation rates for 14C were assumed constant - look where that got you. Seems it's only reasonable to you that everyone play stupid so you can have your way until you're proven utterly wrong again. What I find reasonable is saying "I don't know" when you don't know. But that doesn't make you look smart - apparently. I assume that's bad.

Why are you still beating the light speed and decay rate dead horse? Did you not read my post to you regarding this issue? Did you not verify it for yourself by performing the calculations I suggested you do?

Why have you not tested the assumptions you have about the assumptions science uses? Are your assumptions not subject to test and verification?

1,915 posted on 12/20/2005 9:29:34 AM PST by b_sharp (Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1859 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson