To: Dimensio
"Evolution explains the origins of life" is not an "issue regarding whether evolution is or is not pseudo science", it is simply a false statement. Exactly! If it's false, the "science" supporting it must also be false. I only thought that the useof the euphemism "pseudo" was a nicer way of putting it.
1,833 posted on
12/20/2005 12:25:20 AM PST by
Baraonda
(Demographic is destiny. Don't hire 3rd world illegal aliens nor support businesses that hire them.)
To: Baraonda
Exactly! If it's false, the "science" supporting it must also be false.
The fact is that the theory of evolution does not and has never attempted to explain the origin of life. This does not make evolution "pseudo science", and you are a liar to claim as much. You are lying about what evolution is in order to score points against it, but you only expose your dishonesty when you do so. You are also a liar to claim that I contradicted myself regarding humans and monkeys.
1,834 posted on
12/20/2005 12:28:10 AM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
Derailed train of thought placemark
1,836 posted on
12/20/2005 12:28:24 AM PST by
dread78645
(Sorry Mr. Franklin, We couldn't keep it.)
To: Baraonda
You know, you might find it more profitable, even enjoyable, if you would pull your own chain for a while.
Your intent here is far too obvious to work much longer.
1,912 posted on
12/20/2005 9:13:41 AM PST by
b_sharp
(Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson