"I don't see anyone agreeing with you on that point."
Take ten issues related to evolution. We all agree on 9 out of the 10 issues regarding whether evolution is or is not pseudo science. One issue doesn't make evolution true.
One must learn to agree on disagreeing on trivial, petty and irrelevant issues.
Start with one. If the common ancestry of apes and humans is nonexistent, how does one explain the presence of the twenty or so discovered intermediate steps in the fossil record connecting apes and humans to a common ancestor, the sequencing commonalities between ape and human DNA, the fact that junk DNA mutation accumulations in common genes show a divergence in mutation rates between chimps and humans consistent in time with that interpolated from the fossil record, and the fact that fossil hominids demonstrating have been traced to the region of the world (namely Africa) inherent from the biogeographical distribution of modern day ape species?
I'd certainly love to hear a competing theory with testable implications that links all these disparate pieces of data, or a piece of data that falsifies the theory of common origin between apes and humans. Shoot.