Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: RunningWolf; Dimensio
"Well you make this claim:"

Humans and monkeys share common ancestry.

There you go! I knew I had read it someplace. I'm sure it has been asserted more than once. But because these threads are long ones, they (the evolutionists) hope that we won't be able to find their quotes.

Thanks, RunningWolf.

Eureka!!

1,805 posted on 12/19/2005 11:43:37 PM PST by Baraonda (Demographic is destiny. Don't hire 3rd world illegal aliens nor support businesses that hire them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1797 | View Replies ]


To: Baraonda
There you go! I knew I had read it someplace.

Yeah, all the way back in post #1,789. Don't tell me that you had difficulty finding it.

But because these threads are long ones, they (the evolutionists) hope that we won't be able to find their quotes.

Why would I care if you found a quote that I had posted about fifteen minutes ago? I stand by it. There's nothing wrong with it. Do you have an actual point to make, or are you just blathering on and on because you're too much of a coward to admit that you don't have a rational argument?
1,807 posted on 12/19/2005 11:45:48 PM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1805 | View Replies ]

To: Baraonda
You have really beat them when they ignore you, but they talk about you in other posts.. LOL!!

Wolf
1,809 posted on 12/19/2005 11:47:30 PM PST by RunningWolf (Vet US Army Air Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1805 | View Replies ]

To: Baraonda; RunningWolf; Dimensio
Dimensio: Humans and monkeys share common ancestry.

Baraonda: There you go! I knew I had read it someplace. I'm sure it has been asserted more than once. But because these threads are long ones, they (the evolutionists) hope that we won't be able to find their quotes.

Humans and old world monkeys do share a common ancestor - new world monkeys. Sequences of fossils lead us to believe this, and shared non-conserving sequences of DNA back this conclusion. Using those non-conserving sequences of DNA gives us approximate dates for the split, dates that roughly correspond to dates previously approximated through fossil evidence.

1,903 posted on 12/20/2005 8:43:24 AM PST by b_sharp (Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1805 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson