Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Dimensio
You're approaching it from the wrong angle. To Hitler and his ilk, science was only relevant as a means to one of his ends, and not as a legitimate pursuit unto itself.

Evolution freed some to abandon morality completely (those who were obviously of that bent in the first place) and has been the enabler of many things regarded as unthinkable prior to its prommulgation. If life can happen by accident, then it has no meaning, and taking of life becomes an election, rather than an act of criminal desperation.

This doesn't mean that all who pursue evolution are of that bent, only that those who are have been liberated.

1,702 posted on 12/19/2005 5:13:20 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Atheist and Fool are synonyms; Evolution is where fools hide from the sunrise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1510 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor
Evolution freed some to abandon morality completely (those who were obviously of that bent in the first place) and has been the enabler of many things regarded as unthinkable prior to its prommulgation.

So? Religion can be used the same way. Declare that a God created different groups of people as inherently superior or inferior and presto, you can achieve the same result -- and you don't have to twist observed reality nearly so painfully to do it.
1,707 posted on 12/19/2005 6:01:14 PM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1702 | View Replies ]

To: editor-surveyor
To Hitler and his ilk, science was only relevant as a means to one of his ends, and not as a legitimate pursuit unto itself. Evolution freed some to abandon morality completely (those who were obviously of that bent in the first place) and has been the enabler of many things regarded as unthinkable prior to its prommulgation. If life can happen by accident, then it has no meaning, and taking of life becomes an election, rather than an act of criminal desperation.

But the Nazis didn't believe anything of the sort: that life can happened "by accident". They were creationists, albeit of a mystical variety. They believed that the races were created with particular "souls" which gave each race particular characteristics, and particular fates. (Most notably some races were fated to rule, and by nature were warriors and conquerors -- guess which -- and others were fated to slavery.)

This doctrine can be found both in Mein Kampf, and even more explicitly in The Myth of the Twentieth Century by Alfred Rosenberg, the Nazi's most important philosopher of race.

The Nazis believed in the very opposite of "accident," they believed in FATE. Blood, in which the primeval racial soul was carried, was destiny. Their goal was to recreate the racial/blood purity of the original creation.

1,726 posted on 12/19/2005 7:18:01 PM PST by Stultis (I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1702 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson