Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Havoc; Dimensio; b_sharp
Havoc: And as it happens, I believe the flood occured in the last 5000 years. Given that there is no evidence that atomic decay has been anymore constant than the speed of light or 14C accumulation...

Dimensio: But Havoc already said that he doesn't trust that lightspeed is constant, thus no distance can be accurately measured based upon lightspeed calculations.

A plethora of evidence suggests that the speed of light and radioactive decay rates have been constant for billions of years. Any possible variation thereof is very tiny indeed. I carefully lined up some of the known evidence in a in a previous post on another thread if you want to bother to look.

Havoc, I've gotta say, I looked at your gallery of artwork on your homepage, and I think you're quite an impressive artist (no joke). I can't draw or color like that. I have an idea - you don't try to do science (at least until you learn more) and I won't try to do color drawings. The world will be a better place as a result.

1,636 posted on 12/19/2005 11:04:54 AM PST by Quark2005 (Divination is NOT science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1629 | View Replies ]


To: Quark2005

Not to mention that the "fine structure constant" has not changed in over 13 billion years.


1,652 posted on 12/19/2005 12:20:32 PM PST by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1636 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson