To: Dimensio
"Do you have an actual response to Ichneumon's argument?"
Is Ichneumon's argument one used to destroy the faith of young science students in the veracity of the Word of God? Does it recognize and honor the Creator of the universe?
Do you believe that there were "raindrop imprints" placed in sand in a laminar lay in the Grand Canyon before there was rain?
To: Free Baptist
Is Ichneumon's argument one used to destroy the faith of young science students in the veracity of the Word of God?
No, it is used to expose the absurdity of creationist claims regarding a global flood. It is not Ichneumon's fault or anyone else's if observed reality contradicts what you want to believe.
1,609 posted on
12/19/2005 9:30:03 AM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Free Baptist
"Do you believe that there were "raindrop imprints" placed in sand in a laminar lay in the Grand Canyon before there was rain?"I am curious. Where in the bible does it say that there had never been any rain prior to the flood?
1,612 posted on
12/19/2005 9:39:18 AM PST by
Thatcherite
(More abrasive than SeaLion or ModernMan)
To: Free Baptist
"...lay in the Grand Canyon before there was rain..."
Careful. Although evolution does involve sex, personal experiences do not a theory make!
Besides, the major sandstone unit in the GC (the Coconino)is of aeolian origin--that is, sand dunes, which arose in a dry environment. This layer disproves quite effectively the flood myth.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson