Replies

"No, but that's my point! I have NOT seen it!"

Yet you claim that it is scientific to say that it happened.

"Just like evolutionist, the difference is I don't call what I believe FACT, and tell people this is absolutely what happen."

You don't? lol

"Evolutionist do not allow other views to be introduced."

Sure they do. The new view must have evidence to support it. Creationism/ID don't. They are not scientific claims; why should they be taken seriously?

"An agenda to fool people into thinking this is ALL chance and there is no meaning to any of it,..."

Natural selection is NOT a random process. As for meaning, NO scientific theory deals with *meaning*. That's a philosophical question, not a scientific one.

".now evo maybe true, but until I see some monkey turn into a man, or a half an eye, true transitional changes, (Not someone guess of a transitional change) it's all speculation and conjecture."

If we saw a monkey turn into a man, it would disprove the ToE. Why must creationists wallow in such silly strawman arguments?