Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman
In addition to the e valid criticisms the others have made of your parade of skulls the following should be noted.

The Neanderthals had larger craniums than modern humans, but you can't see that from looking at J-l compared to M-N. The modern humans look larger. Which raises the question of whether the skulls are presented to scale or have been sized to fit.

Also skull F (1470) was reconstructed from a skull that had been smashed into over 100 pieces. It was originally constructed to appear flat face but after a Creationist scientists examined it, and similarities to Australopithecus were identified, it was reconstructed having a sloping face and determined to be a large brained Australopithecus.

Skulls C&D also look to be particularly poor specimens.

The Rise and Fall of Skull 1470

151 posted on 12/15/2005 11:29:47 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: DannyTN
I appreciate your comments, but I do not consider answersingenesis.com as a reliable source for information on anything pertaining to evolution.

Have you seen how they stretch science to try to support the global flood?

156 posted on 12/15/2005 11:32:54 AM PST by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson