I doubt it, because the hypothesis is testable now. It has been mathematically defined (specified complexity, information theory) and can therefore be experimentally tested. Darwinists, on the other hand, can't even decide on an empirical definition of species yet go about boldly proclaiming we all descended from one.
Provide the testable hypothesis that has been categorically accepted throughout the world by all scientists, pro or non, right or left.
Please.
No, at least two things wrong here.
1) There is no proof that something with a high "specified complexity" cannot be the outcome of evolution. I have no idea that such a statement is provable at all, but it's never been done.
2) Assume, as though it were possible, that 1) were proven true. At best, the demonstration that some biological system were "specifically complex" would tend to falsify ToE. How would it be evidence for ID? ID "theory" does not predict that "specifically complex" things exist, so how could finding such a thing count as evidence for ID?