Actually, it's your posts that give that impression. ID assumes an unspecified "intelligent designer." It very carefully avoids naming this "designer." Read up on it. Your continued nattering about atheism puts you squarely in the creationist camp. Additionally, your points tend to be logical fallacies of the "evolution leads to Nazisms/fascism/communism/rap music" sort. These arguments are exactly the ones creationists use.
We have no doubt the distinction between "evolutionist and useful idiot commie" is too subtle for you ... as is the distinction between science and politics.
Oh, so evolution says nothing in any way about "the existence or involvements" of any diety? It doesn't say that humans could have originated without a diety? If it says anything it says that -- and that is saying something extemely important about a diety, whether you are willing to admit it or not.
There's that "deity" objection again, neatly proving the point I was making above. And you're right about that much -- the Theory of Evolution says nothing in any way about "the existence or involvements of any deity." You really ought to read a little about it before you attack it. In this respect, the TOE is exactly like every other theory in science: no deity enters into any of them. And it also does not address the beginning of life. Your ignorance of the theory is all-encompassing.
But have fun -- name the deity involved in germ theory. Or the one in electromagnetic theory.
In fact, that is precisely why Marx and Hitler latched on to it. But I can't believe that even you are stupid enough to not know that.
Hitler and Marx breathed a mixture of nitrogen and oxygen. Better stop doing that. Hitler used germ theory. That must go out, too. We can see where you're headed, even if you can't.
Or can you see the fallacy in the above thinking, but not in your trying to connect the Theory of Evolution to Hitler and Marx? BTW, some people objected to the Theory of Evolution because it had so obviously inspired soulless, Godless, capitalism. Is that also in your catalogue of objections? If not, why not?
After all is said and done, the fact remains that the purely naturalist theory of evolution is the intellectual lynchpin of communism.
Oh, please. Even if your statement is true, it's meaningless insofar as the validity of the theory goes. All science is "purely naturalist." Is it all, therefore "the intellectual lynch pin of communism"?
It's dogmatic "science" may ultimately succeed in salvaging communism from the ash-heap of history -- and useful idiots like you will be largely to blame.
Nice ad hom. All science is "dogmatic" in the sense that it expects theories to conform to its requirements in order to be considered science. Again, if you were really pushing ID and not a religious viewpoint, you'd realize this. But you're not so you don't.
Well Marxists delare communism to be scientific.
Curious how the most extreme opponents can agree. Biblical Literalists hold a single error of fact in the Bible will invalidate everything within. Who agrees with them? Militant atheists.